Councillor Phil Alford, Cabinet Member for
Housing, updated the Committee on progress to deliver on the
Homeless Prevention Strategy Action Plan that was approved by Full
Council in November 2019, alongside John Walker, Housing Solutions
Service Manager.
The progress of each of the five priority
areas were briefly detailed, with the continued significant
increase in demand being highlighted. Despite this, officers had
worked hard to retain sustainability, manage expectations, and
increase the Council’s temporary accommodation portfolio. The
unaffordability and unstable nature of the private rented sector
alongside the rising demand for housing was noted and Members were
reassured that the issues within the sector were nationwide and not
affecting just Wiltshire specifically. Officers were confident that
the strategy was dynamic and responsive and that it had
demonstrated robustness and resilience across the service.
Finally, officers drew attention to the
positive work undertaken within Priority 4, specifically the
dedicated accommodation for care experienced young people and
prison leavers as part of SDS40.
During the discussion, points included:
- It was confirmed that the impacts of
SDS40 on the Council had been minimal.
- It was explained that the Rough
Sleepers Service was very active with mechanisms in place to
identify those persons who may begin rough sleeping, wraparound
support for those persons with personal or health issues, and one
officer dedicated to preventing rough sleeping at the outset.
Furthermore, it was confirmed that the Council had a substantial
rough sleeper portfolio with various temporary accommodations
available for rough sleepers.
- Members raised concerns in respect
of the potential for a higher rate of failure by housing rough
sleepers outside of their community areas and into more central
areas. In response, it was explained that as house prices varied
significantly across Wiltshire, it was difficult to acquire
suitable temporary accommodation stock in every community
in order to meet local need. Despite
this, Members were reassured that there was a significant
purchasing programme in place and that officers undertook regular
operational meetings on a case-by-case basis to move people on from
temporary accommodation as soon as possible. However, it was
highlighted that the speed in which people were rehoused was
dependent on factors such as the persons themselves in terms of
readiness to live independently, and the turnover rate of suitable
affordable homes of the right size.
- It was explained that the number of
rough sleepers within the County was assessed by a standardised
annual count in line with a national formula alongside various
internal systems, such as monthly snapshots. However, it was
highlighted that due to the relatively small number of rough
sleepers in County, there were inherent challenges around the
interpretation of the trend line as one person could make a
statistically large impact/variation. Furthermore, it was
emphasised that rough sleepers were generally a transient group
which could be difficult to quantify at times.
- Seasonal impacts were highlighted,
with it being noted that rough sleeper numbers historically rose
during the summer months when the temperature was warmer. It was
also highlighted that although the Rough Sleeper Team engaged
closely with a persistent and core group of rough sleepers and
offered support and accommodation, there were challenges with those
individuals who may be disengaged from more conventional
lifestyles.
- It was further explained that during
the winter months where the weather was forecast to be 0°c or
below for three nights or longer, all partner organisations,
statutory and voluntary agencies would be notified in order for them to organise any necessary
arrangements to get any person known to be sleeping rough into
temporary accommodation as soon as possible.
- It was noted that the current
strategy and 5 priority areas had been very effective and that
those practices implemented by the strategy were now embedded into
the service and would be reviewed on an ongoing basis. Further to
this, officers were reflecting upon the results of the past 5 years
and were intending on continuing conversations with colleagues and
stakeholders to maintain best practice.
- With regard
to social rented homes, it was noted that the current rate
at which social rented and affordable rented homes were being built
was not meeting the pace of demand. However, although officers had
no control over demand, they reassured Members that officers within
the Council’s enabling function were working hard with
landowners, developers, and housing providers/associations to
develop other sites to meet the need, and that as much affordable
housing as possible was being sought.
- It was noted that within the
Development Programme, officers were considering all opportunities
that best delivered homes in the most cost-effective way. As such,
options such as prefabricated buildings or dwellings made from
repurposed shipping containers were all investigated. However, it
was highlighted that the priority was to acquire sustainable
properties that ensured longevity, were suitable, and met necessary
space standards for the individuals moving into them.
- Finally, officers were commended for
their hard work and positive report, particularly with their
approach around the Rough Sleeper Partnership.
At the conclusion of the discussion, it
was
Resolved:
The Committee:
a)
Welcomed the progress made on the Homeless Prevention Strategy
Action Plan.
b)
Requested that the next Homeless Prevention Strategy Action Plan
is presented to the Committee when appropriate. The report to also
include budgets and trends in rough sleeper numbers.