Demolition of existing buildings and structures and construction of 248 residential homes, playing pitches, allotments, areas of open space, upgrading of existing play area, sustainable drainage infrastructure, internal roads, paths and parking areas, landscaping and associated works, plant and infrastructure (Reserved Matters Application pursuant to 19/11459/OUT - relating to appearance, landscape, layout and scale) (Amended Details)
Minutes:
Public Participation
Jemma Foster, as Senior Planning Officer, presented the report which recommended that the Committee approved the application, subject to conditions, for the demolition of existing building and structures and construction of 248 residential homes, playing pitches, allotments, areas of open space, upgrading of existing play area, sustainable drainage infrastructure, internal roads, paths, and parking areas, landscaping and associated works, plant, and infrastructure.
Key material considerations were identified including the principle of development; scale, design, and layout; landscape and visual impact; heritage impact; drainage; ecological impact; impact on amenity; highways; other material matters; Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL), and Section 106 Legal Agreement.
Members of the Committee then had the opportunity to ask technical questions to the officer and queried matters relating to the proposal’s compliance with the Trowbridge Bat Mitigation Strategy (TBMS); the location of the proposed hammerhead and the impacts on existing residents and future neighbouring development as part of the Wiltshire Housing Sites Allocation Plan (WHSAP); and the accessibility for vehicles through Drynham Lane and Wiltshire Drive into the development. Further queries were made in respect of the on-site provision of rainwater harvesting; references to the use of fires within the Planning Conditions; and the maintenance of the proposed open spaces.
In response, Case Officer and attending Council Ecology Officer acknowledged that there was a disagreement between residents and Wiltshire Council officers with respect to where the buffer zones should be measured from in respecting to providing sufficient off-setting from the site boundary and when applying the TBMS. Officers also argued that the TBMS was a guidance document with the primary purpose of ensuring that the functionality of core bat corridors were maintained. As such, additional assessments, surveys, and reports that were presented to the Council as part of the formal application submissions provided more detail for particular sites and was fully considered as part of a full assessment by the Council’s Ecologists and Natural England, which led them to endorse reserved matters approval being recommended.
It was further explained that the hammerhead had been granted permission at the outline stage in terms of its proposed location after a full assessment was completed by the Council’s Highway Authority, with other potential locations raising fly tipping concerns. However, it was confirmed that the hammerhead’s position alongside other highway safety concerns could be reviewed again by the Highways Team under the Section 278 agreement. Furthermore, Members were informed that there were no proposals to limit accessibility for vehicles in and around the site, but that the hammerhead would lead to Drynham Lane and would no longer be a through road.
Officers also confirmed that there were no plans for any on-site rainwater harvesting, but it was emphasised that the applicants were committed to a number of other measures with regard to climate change considerations, and it was confirmed that the references to the use of fires as set out within the Planning Conditions could be removed.
The named public speakers as detailed above then had the opportunity to present their views to the Committee.
Following the public forum, Members were reminded that as the application had outline planning approval, the reserved matters application could only assess those specific reserved matters and the detail as submitted rather than alternative forms of development, and not the principle of development. Furthermore, Members were reassured that if consent was given, Wessex Water had confirmed that a full review, and any ensuing infrastructure improvement works, would be undertaken to ensure that there was adequate capacity in the main drainage systems to serve both existing and the proposed dwellings.
Councillor Antonio Piazza, as the Local Unitary Member, then spoke to the application where he raised a number of concerns including the form of the proposed development and its community integration, the environmental and flood risks, traffic concerns, and accessibility. The importance of holding the development to the highest standards was also highlighted alongside ensuring the preservation of the natural environment on site and the quality of life for existing and new residents.
A debate then followed where Members acknowledged the concerns raised by Cllr Piazza and residents and discussed the TBMS and different highways aspects; in particular, safety concerns relating to the position of the hammerhead and highway works. Following which, Members suggested including an informative which requested that the location of the hammerhead be revisited by the developer.
At the conclusion the debate, Councillor Stewart Palmen moved to approve the application in line with officer recommendations, with the addition of an informative relating to the siting of the proposed hammerhead and the removal of references to the use of fires within Planning Conditions 2, 3, 4, and 5, which was seconded by Councillor Gordon King.
Following a vote on the motion, it was:
Resolved:
The Committee APPROVED the application subject to the following conditions:
· All drawings and reports contained in the Plan List received by the Local Planning Authority on 12th November 2024 (dated November 2024)
· Arboricultural Report, prepared by Silverback Consultancy Ltd and dated April 2024
· Addendum to Arboricultural Report by Silverback Consultancy Ltd and dated 6th November 2024
REASON: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.
· A specification for protective fencing to trees during both demolition and construction phases which complies with BS5837:2013 and a plan indicating the alignment of the protective fencing;
· A specification for scaffolding and ground protection within tree protection zones in accordance with British Standard 5837: 2013;
· A schedule of tree works conforming to British Standard 3998: 2010;
· Details of general arboricultural matters such as the area for storage of materials, concrete mixing.
· Plans and particulars showing the siting of the service and piping infrastructure;
· A full specification for the construction of any arboriculturally sensitive structures and sections through them, including the installation of boundary treatment works, the method of construction of the access driveway including details of the no-dig specification and extent of the areas of the driveway to be constructed using a no-dig specification;
· Details of the works requiring arboricultural supervision to be carried out by the developer’s arboricultural consultant, including details of the frequency of supervisory visits and procedure for notifying the Local Planning Authority of the findings of the supervisory visits; and
· Details of all other activities, which have implications for trees on or adjacent to the site.
· In order that trees to be retained on-site are not damaged during the construction works and to ensure that as far as possible the work is carried no demolition, site clearance or development should commence on site until a pre-commencement site meeting has been held, attended by the developer’s arboricultural consultant and the designated site foreman.
REASON: In order that the Local Planning Authority may be satisfied that the trees to be retained on and adjacent to the site will not be damaged during the construction works and to ensure that as far as possible the work is carried out in accordance with current best practice and section 197 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990
· A specification for protective fencing to trees during both demolition and construction phases which complies with BS5837:2013 and a plan indicating the alignment of the protective fencing;
· A specification for scaffolding and ground protection within tree protection zones in accordance with British Standard 5837: 2013;
· A schedule of tree works conforming to British Standard 3998: 2010;
· Details of general arboricultural matters such as the area for storage of materials, concrete mixing.
· Plans and particulars showing the siting of the service and piping infrastructure;
· A full specification for the construction of any arboriculturally sensitive structures and sections through them, including the installation of boundary treatment works, the method of construction of the access driveway including details of the no-dig specification and extent of the areas of the driveway to be constructed using a no-dig specification;
· Details of the works requiring arboricultural supervision to be carried out by the developer’s arboricultural consultant, including details of the frequency of supervisory visits and procedure for notifying the Local Planning Authority of the findings of the supervisory visits; and
· Details of all other activities, which have implications for trees on or adjacent to the site.
· In order that trees to be retained on-site are not damaged during the construction works and to ensure that as far as possible the work is carried no demolition, site clearance or development should commence on site until a pre-commencement site meeting has been held, attended by the developer’s arboricultural consultant and the designated site foreman.
REASON: In order that the Local Planning Authority may be satisfied that the trees to be retained on and adjacent to the site will not be damaged during the construction works and to ensure that as far as possible the work is carried out in accordance with current best practice and section 197 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990
· A specification for protective fencing to trees during both demolition and construction phases which complies with BS5837:2013 and a plan indicating the alignment of theprotective fencing;
· A specification for scaffolding and ground protection within tree protection zones in accordance with British Standard 5837: 2013;
· A schedule of tree works conforming to British Standard 3998: 2010;
· Details of general arboricultural matters such as the area for storage of materials, concrete mixing.
· Plans and particulars showing the siting of the service and piping infrastructure;
· A full specification for the construction of any arboriculturally sensitive structures and sections through them, including the installation of boundary treatment works, the method of construction of the access driveway including details of the no-dig specification and extent of the areas of the driveway to be constructed using a no-dig specification;
· Details of the works requiring arboricultural supervision to be carried out by the developer’s arboricultural consultant, including details of the frequency of supervisory visits and procedure for notifying the Local Planning Authority of the findings of the supervisory visits; and
· Details of all other activities, which have implications for trees on or adjacent to the site.
· In order that trees to be retained on-site are not damaged during the construction works and to ensure that as far as possible the work is carried no demolition, site clearance or development should commence on site until a pre-commencement site meeting has been held, attended by the developer’s arboricultural consultant and the designated site foreman.
REASON: In order that the Local Planning Authority may be satisfied that the trees to be retained on and adjacent to the site will not be damaged during the construction works and to ensure that as far as possible the work is carried out in accordance with current best practice and section 197 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990
· A specification for protective fencing to trees during both demolition and construction phases which complies with BS5837:2013 and a plan indicating the alignment of the protective fencing;
· A specification for scaffolding and ground protection within tree protection zones in accordance with British Standard 5837: 2013;
· A schedule of tree works conforming to British Standard 3998: 2010;
· Details of general arboricultural matters such as the area for storage of materials, concrete mixing.
· Plans and particulars showing the siting of the service and piping infrastructure;
· A full specification for the construction of any arboriculturally sensitive structures andm sections through them, including the installation of boundary treatment works, the method of construction of the access driveway including details of the no-dig specification and extent of the areas of the driveway to be constructed using a no-dig specification;
· Details of the works requiring arboricultural supervision to be carried out by the developer’s arboricultural consultant, including details of the frequency of supervisory visits and procedure for notifying the Local Planning Authority of the findings of the supervisory visits; and
· Details of all other activities, which have implications for trees on or adjacent to the site.
· In order that trees to be retained on-site are not damaged during the construction works and to ensure that as far as possible the work is carried no demolition, site clearance or development should commence on site until a pre-commencement site meeting has been held, attended by the developer’s arboricultural consultant and the designated site foreman.
REASON: In order that the Local Planning Authority may be satisfied that the trees to be retained on and adjacent to the site will not be damaged during the construction works and to ensure that as far as possible the work is carried out in accordance with current best practice and section 197 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990
REASON: The application contained insufficient information to enable this matter to be considered prior to granting planning permission and the matter is required to be agreed with the Local Planning Authority before development commences in order that the development is undertaken in an acceptable manner, in the interests of the immediate area.
REASON: The application contained insufficient information to enable this matter to be considered prior to granting planning permission and the matter is required to be agreed with the Local Planning Authority before development commences in order that the development is undertaken in an acceptable manner, in the interests of the immediate area.
REASON: The application contained insufficient information to enable this matter to be considered prior to granting planning permission and the matter is required to be agreed with the Local Planning Authority before development commences in order that the development is undertaken in an acceptable manner, in the interests of the immediate area.
REASON: The application contained insufficient information to enable this matter to be considered prior to granting planning permission and the matter is required to be agreed with the Local Planning Authority before development commences in order that the development is undertaken in an acceptable manner, in the interests of the immediate area.
REASON: The application contained insufficient information to enable this matter to be considered prior to granting planning permission and the matter is required to be agreed with the Local Planning Authority before development commences in order that the development is undertaken in an acceptable manner, in the interests of the amenity of future occupiers.
REASON: The application contained insufficient information to enable this matter to be considered prior to granting planning permission and the matter is required to be agreed with the Local Planning Authority before development commences in order that the development is undertaken in an acceptable manner, in the interests of the amenity of future occupiers.
REASON: The application contained insufficient information to enable this matter to be considered prior to granting planning permission and the matter is required to be agreed with the Local Planning Authority before development commences in order that the development is undertaken in an acceptable manner, in the interests of the amenity of future occupiers.
REASON: The application contained insufficient information to enable this matter to be considered prior to granting planning permission and the matter is required to be agreed with the Local Planning Authority before development commences in order that the development is undertaken in an acceptable manner, in the interests of providing mitigation and enhancement for biodiversity
REASON: In the interest of amenity of future occupiers.
REASON: In the interest of amenity of future occupiers.
The windows shall thereafter be maintained in accordance with the approved details for the lifetime of the development.
REASON: In the interest of amenity of future occupiers.
REASON: In the interests of highway safety.
REASON: To ensure that satisfactory facilities for the parking of cycles are provided and to encourage travel by means other than the private car.
REASON: To secure the retention of adequate parking provision, in the interests of highway safety.
Informatives:
· We note the applicant has stated Land Drainage Consent is required, the applicant will be required to gain land drainage consent to de-culvert where the swale is proposed. Land Drainage Consent is also required to discharge into the Ordinary Watercourse & River Biss.
· We note the applicant has said the maintenance for SuDS features, such as rain gardens, on individual plots will be the responsibility of the owner of the plot. The applicant must ensure this included in the property deeds.
· We note the applicant has stated there could be 300mm flood depths of the access road to the site, we recommend the applicant shares flood evacuation advice as stated in Section 6 of the Flood Risk Assessment Addendum 2 to the owners and site management to ensure the safe ingress for emergency services, and safe egress for those on site.
Supporting documents: