Venue: Council Chamber - County Hall, Bythesea Road, Trowbridge, BA14 8JN. View directions
Contact: Lisa Moore 01722 434560 Email: lisa.moore@wiltshire.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies To receive any apologies or substitutions for the meeting. Minutes: Apologies were received from Councillor Gordon King. Councillor King was substituted by Councillor Derek Walters.
An apology was also received from Independent Person Pat Bunche. |
|
Minutes of the Previous Meeting To approve the minutes of the meeting held on 23 June 2021. Minutes: The minutes of the meeting held on 23
June 2021 were presented
for Resolved:
|
|
Declarations of Interest To receive any declarations of disclosable interests, or dispensations granted by the Standards Committee. Minutes: There were no declarations. |
|
Meeting Procedure and Assessment Criteria To note the procedure and assessment criteria for the meeting. Supporting documents: Minutes: The meeting procedure and assessment criteria were noted |
|
Exclusion of the Public To consider passing the following resolution:
To agree that in accordance with Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 to exclude the public from the meeting for the business specified in Agenda Item Numbers 6 onwards, because it is likely that if members of the public were present there would be disclosure to them of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 1 of Part I of Schedule 12A to the Act and the public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information to the public.
Paragraph 1 - information relating to an individual Minutes: It was,
Resolved:
To agree that in accordance with Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 to exclude the public from the meeting for the business specified in Agenda Item Numbers 6-8, because it is likely that if members of the public were present there would be disclosure to them of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 1 of Part I of Schedule 12A to the Act and the public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information to the public |
|
Assessment of Complaint: COC134813 Minutes: Due to the absence of the Independent Person assigned to consider the complaint with the Sub-Committee, after taking legal advice, It was determined that the assessment of the complaint should be deferred until the next meeting on 30 September 2021.
The Complainant who was in attendance, provided a written copy of his statement for inclusion in the papers for the next meeting.
Resolved:
To defer the assessment of COC134813 until 30 September 2021.
|
|
Complaint: COC131452 Minutes: A complaint had been submitted on 11 October 2020 by Councillor Jon Hubbard (the Complainant) regarding the conduct of Councillor Vanessa Fiorelli (the Subject Member), then a Member of Melksham Town Council.
It was alleged that the Subject Member breached the town council’s code of conduct in that she had, contrary to the financial regulations and standing orders of the Melksham Town Council, arranged for a locum Town Clerk to be employed when she had no authority to do so and by such demonstrated a disregard of the Nolan principles specifically integrity, objectivity, accountability openness, honesty and leadership which amounts to a breach of the Council’s code of conduct.
The complaint was initially heard by the Assessment Sub-Committee on 19 November 2020, when it was determined to refer the complaint for investigation.
Following receipt of an Investigating Officer’s report and comments from parties, the Monitoring Officer had recommended that no further action be taken in respect of this complaint.
In accordance with paragraph 7.2 of Protocol 11, the decision of the Monitoring Officer’s recommendation was reported to the Sub-Committee for information. The Sub-Committee accepted the conclusion that the process followed in the investigation was sound, and noted the comments of the Independent Person, and found no reason to depart from the recommendation.
At the conclusion if discussion, it
was, Resolved:
|
|
Complaint COC129729 Minutes: A complaint had been submitted on 25 June 2020 by Mr & Mrs Allsworth (the Complainants) regarding the conduct of Councillor Antonio Piazza (the Subject Member), a Member of Trowbridge Town Council.
It was alleged that the Subject Member has used his position as a Councillor to discourage a delivery company from making deliveries to the complainant’s home address.
The Complainants alleged that by identifying himself as a Councillor of Trowbridge Town Council the Subject Member has breached the Trowbridge Town Council Code of Conduct by: -
a. not promoting or supporting high standards in his public office (localism Act 2011 and general principles), and/or b. using his position for personal benefit he is not acting with integrity, (Nolan Principles) and/or c. using his position improperly to gain an advantage/confer a disadvantage in his private life over the Complainant.
The complaint was initially heard by the Assessment Sub-Committee on 18 August 2020, when the Committee determined to refer the complaint for investigation.
Following receipt of an Investigating Officer’s report and comments from parties, the Monitoring determined the allegations required further enquiry, details of which were included as Appendix C to the Investigation report. At the completion of the Investigating Officer’s additional enquiries, she confirmed that there was nothing within the information which altered her original conclusion in this matter that the actions had not risen to the level of a breach.
After Consideration of the Report and the additional enquiries, the Monitoring Officer determined to recommend to the Sub-Committee that no further action be taken in respect of the complaint.
The Sub Committee agreed with the observations of the Monitoring Officer, which were that they believed that the Subject Member should be reminded of his professional/personal boundaries and the potential for conflicts of interest. It was their view that the Subject Member should have handled the matter relating to his mother professionally and advised her to contact her local councillor or referred her to them. In addition, he should also have avoided using his councillor status in any way if he was making personal enquiries.
In accordance with paragraph 7.2 of Protocol 11, the
decision of the Monitoring Officer’s recommendation was
reported to the Sub-Committee for information. They considered that
there had been a fair and comprehensive investigation. At the
conclusion of discussion, it was, Resolved:
|