Minutes:
Public Participation
Jeremy Kelton spoke in objection to the application.
Alastair Wright spoke in objection to the application.
Danny Howell spoke in objection to the application.
Steve Dancey spoke in objection to the application.
Mike Robert spoke in support of the application.
Isabel Allen spoke in support of the application.
Keith Humphries spoke in support of the application.
Mike Perry spoke on behalf of Bishopstrow Parish Council in objection to the application.
Sue Fraser spoke on behalf of Warminster Town Council in support of the application.
The Planning Officer outlined the report which recommended the application for approval subject to a section 106 legal agreement. The site description and an overview of the proposed development were also given.
The Planning Officer outlined the relevant planning policy and drew attention to the relevant planning considerations.
52 letters of objection had been received which were outlined in the report and it was noted that a further 309 had signed an online petition. A letter had also been received from the local MP and 12 late objections from consultees including Fish Legal and the Wiltshire Fishery Association. 4 letters of support had also been received.
Members were invited to ask technical questions about the site. Questions focused on the cascading marketing approach which would be used, clarification on the custom build definition and if the development would be affected by flooding.
Members of the public were invited to speak on the application as listed above.
Cllr Davis as local member spoke against the application; the main points raised included: the site being located outside of the Warminster town planning policy limits, flooding and that the application was an outline application with no details.
The debate focused on affordable housing, policy H1 and CP2, the buffer zones around the development and limiting the developments to two storeys.
During the course of debate there was a discussion of the position of Selwood Housing, and Councillor Magnus Macdonald declared that he was a member of the Selwood board. However, Selwood Housing made a late submission in writing to clarify that it was a prospective partner, not the applicant, and that there was no formal agreement in place, after which Councillor Magnus Macdonald stated that he would vote on the application.
A motion to refuse the application was put forward and the requisite number of members having requested a recorded vote, the results were as followed:
For;
Cllrs Trevor Carbin, Ernie Clark, Andrew Davis, John Knight, Christopher Newbury.
Against;
Cllrs Dennis Drewett, Magnus Macdonald, Pip Ridout, Jonathon Seed, Roy While, Graham Payne.
The motion was defeated and a new motion to approve the recommendation was put forward with an added condition to impose a 2 storey restriction on the development. An amendment to the motion was proposed to increase the buffer zone from 8 metres to 20 metres. The amendment was defeated and the original motion to approve the recommendation with the additional condition was back on the table for discussion. The requisite number of member having requested a recorded vote the results were as followed:
For:
Cllrs Dennis Drewett, Magnus Macdonald, Pip Ridout, Jonathon Seed, Roy While, Graham Payne.
Against:
Cllrs Trevor Carbin, Ernie Clark, Andrew Davis, John Knight, Christopher Newbury.
Resolved
The Area Development Manager be authorised to grant permission on the completion of a legal agreement to secure:-
And Subject to the following conditions :
|
REASON: To comply with the provisions of Section 92 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
|
|
(a) The scale of the development; (b) The layout of the development; (c) The external appearance of the development; (d) The landscaping of the site;
The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.
REASON: The application was made for outline planning permission and is granted to comply with the provisions of Section 92 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and Article 3(1) of the Town and Country Planning (General Development Procedure) Order 1995.
|
|
REASON: To comply with the provisions of Section 92 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
|
|
REASON: To ensure that the design quality envisaged at outline stage is actually delivered in the final scheme.
|
|
Step (i) Site Characterisation: An investigation and risk assessment must be completed to assess the nature and extent of any contamination on the site, whether or not it originates on the site. The investigation and risk assessment must be undertaken by competent persons and a written report of the findings submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The report of the findings must include:
· A survey of the extent, nature and scale of contamination on site; · The collection and interpretation of relevant information to form a conceptual model of the site, and a preliminary risk assessment of all the likely pollutant linkages; · If the preliminary risk assessment identifies any potentially significant pollutant linkages a ground investigation shall be carried out, to provide further information on the location, type and characteristics that can influence the behaviour of the contaminants; · An assessment of the potential risks to: a) human health, b) property (existing or proposed) including buildings, crops, livestock, pets, woodland and service lines and pipes, c) adjoining land, d) groundwater and surface waters, e) ecological systems, f) archaeological sites and ancient monuments
This must be conducted in accordance with DEFRA and the Environment Agency’s “Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination, CLR 11” and other authoritative guidance.
Step (ii) Submission of Remediation Scheme: If any unacceptable risks are identified as a result of the investigation and assessment referred to in step (i) above, a detailed remediation scheme to bring the site to a condition suitable for the intended use must be prepared. This should detail the works required to remove any unacceptable risks to human health, buildings and other property and the natural and historical environment, should be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The scheme must include all works to be undertaken, proposed remediation objectives and remediation criteria, a timetable of works and site management procedures.
Step (iii) Implementation of Approved Remediation Scheme: The approved remediation scheme under step (ii) must be carried out in accordance with its requirements. The Local Planning Authority must be given at least two weeks written notification of commencement of the remediation scheme works.
|
|
Step (iv) Reporting of Unexpected Contamination: In the event that contamination is found at any time when carrying out the approved development that was not previously identified it should be reported in writing immediately to the Local Planning Authority. An investigation and risk assessment should be undertaken in accordance with the requirements of step (i) above and where remediation is necessary, a remediation scheme should be prepared in accordance with the requirements of step (ii) and submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
Step (v) Verification of remedial works: Following completion of measures identified in the approved remediation scheme a verification report should be submitted to the Local Planning Authority. The report should demonstrate the effectiveness of the remedial works.
A statement should also be provided by the developer which is signed by a person who is competent to confirm that the works detailed in the approved scheme have been carried out (The Local Planning Authority can provide a draft Remediation Certificate when the details of the remediation scheme have been approved at stage (ii) above).
The verification report and signed statement should be submitted to and approved in writing of the Local Planning Authority.
Step (vi) Long Term Monitoring and Maintenance: If a monitoring and maintenance scheme is required as part of the approved remediation scheme, reports must be prepared and submitted to the Local Planning Authority for approval at the relevant stages in the development process as approved by the Local Planning Authority in the scheme approved pursuant to step (ii) above, until all the remediation objectives in that scheme have been achieved.
All works must be conducted in accordance with DEFRA and the Environment Agency's "Model Procedures for the Management of Land Contamination, CLR 11" and other authoritative guidance.
REASON: To ensure that risks from land contamination to the future users of the land and neighbouring land are minimised, together with those to controlled waters, property and ecological systems, and to ensure that the development can be carried out safely without unacceptable risks to workers, neighbours and other offsite receptors.
|
|
REASON: In the interests of ensuring correct drainage of the frontage ditch and the structural integrity of the access road serving the site.
|
|
REASON: In the interests of highway safety.
|
|
REASON: In the interests of highway safety.
|
|
REASON: In the interests of highway safety.
|
|
REASON: To ensure that proper provision is made for sewerage of the site and that the development does not increase the risk of sewer flooding to downstream property.
|
|
REASON: In the interests of maintaining the ecological interest of the River Wylye corridor and River Avon system SSSI.
|
|
· Limiting the surface water run-off generated by the 1 in 100 year critical storm, including a 30% allowance for climate change, so that it will not exceed the run-off from the undeveloped site and not increase the risk of flooding off-site (paragraph 5.2). · Ground levels within Flood Zones 3 & 2 shall not be raised - all ground levels shall remain as 'existing' within these Flood Zones (paragraph 3.1). · Finished floor levels shall be set no lower than 104.65 metres above Ordnance Datum (paragraph 4.2.1).
REASON: To prevent flooding by ensuring the satisfactory storage of/disposal of surface water from the site as well as ensuring that there will be no increased risk of flooding to other land/properties due to impedance of flood flows and/or reduction of flood storage capacity.
|
|
REASON: To provide riparian owner access to facilitate maintenance and possible future improvements.
|
|
REASON: Penetrative foundation methods can result in risks to potable water supplies. Thus it needs to be demonstrated that any proposed piling will not result in contamination of groundwater.
|
|
REASON: To protect controlled waters from pollution.
|
|
REASON To prevent pollution of the water environment and maintain the water quality of the River Avon SAC.
|
|
REASON: In the interests of sustainable development and prudent use of natural resources.
18. The dwellings to be submitted as part of any subsequent reserved matters application(s) shall be of a maximum of two storeys in height.
REASON: In the interests of visual amenity.
|
|
Site Location Plan 340/S/200 Proposed Ecology Zone 340/S/203 Proposed Site Access Junction & Visibility Splay IMA-13-071/010A Schematic Ditch Culvert at Site Access IMA-13-071/003 Indicative Masterplan 2561-100
REASON: For the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning.
|
|
INFORMATIVES TO APPLICANT:
1. Safeguards should be implemented during the construction phase to minimise the risks of pollution from the development. Such safeguards should cover:
- the use of plant and machinery - oils/chemicals and materials - the use and routing of heavy plant and vehicles - the location and form of work and storage areas and compounds - the control and removal of spoil and wastes.
The applicant should refer to the Environment Agency's Pollution Prevention Guidelines at:
http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/business/topics/pollution/39083.aspx.
|
|
2. There are ordinary watercourses within or in close proximity to the site. If it is intended to obstruct the flow in the watercourse (permanently or temporarily, including culverting) you will require prior Land Drainage Consent from Wiltshire Council as the Lead Local Flood Authority. Please contact the Drainage Team to discuss their requirements:-
|
|
3. Under the terms of the Water Resources Act 1991 and the Land Drainage Byelaws the prior written consent (Flood Defence Consent) of the Environment Agency is required for any proposed works (permanent or temporary) or structures in, under, over or within 8 metres of the top of the bank of the River Wylye, designated a 'main' river. The need for this consent is over and above the need for planning consent. The applicant is advised to contact Daniel Griffin on 01258 483421 to discuss the scope of our controls.
|
|
4. An appropriate submitted scheme to discharge the water efficiency condition would include a water usage calculator showing how the development will not exceed a usage level of 105 litres per person per day.
|
The Committee had a 15 minute recess at 17:40 and resumed at 17.55.
Supporting documents: