Decision details

To:

(i)         Consider objections to proposed amendments to the layout of waiting restrictions in Residents’ Parking Zone A (RPZA), Salisbury.

(ii)        Recommend the making of the Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) with amendments to the advertised proposals.

I approvethat:

(i)         The RPZA be implemented as advertised subject to the following amendments:

(a)          The proposed time limited parking bay opposite Nos. 5-9 Wyndham Road be converted to a permit holder’s only parking bay.

(b)          The location of the proposed time limited parking bay outside of Nos. 79-81 St. Mark’s Road be swapped with the proposed location of the permit holder’s only parking bay opposite No. 108 St. Mark’s Road. [Please refer to Appendix 6, Comment Reference Numbers 5, 46 and 48]

(c)          The proposed driveway protection (white bar) marking outside of No. 1 Belle Vue Road and No. 3 Albany Road is not provided and the existing NWAAT restriction is retained. [Please refer to Appendix 6, Comment Reference Number 6]

(d)          The proposed permit holders only parking bays outside of Nos. 2 and 4 Woodstock Road are replaced with driveway protection (white bar) markings. [Please refer to Appendix 6, Comment Reference Numbers 35 and 38]

(e)          The proposed driveway protection (white bar) marking outside of No. 10 Queens Road is not provided and the existing NWAAT restriction is retained. [Please refer to Appendix 6, Comment Reference Number 41]

(f)           The location of the proposed time limited parking bay outside of Nos. 40-44 Belle Vue Road be swapped with the proposed location of the permit holder’s only parking bay opposite No. 3 Belle Vue Road. [Please refer to Appendix 6, Comment Reference Number 48]

A plan showing a revised layout of waiting restrictions within RPZA taking into account the proposed amendments outlined above is attached as Appendix 7.

(ii)        A TRO proposing the introduction of a NWAAT restriction on the north-western side of Kings Road be processed, but not before the current review of RPZA has been completed and then only as and when funding is available to do so.

            (iii)       Objectors and supporters be informed accordingly.

                This decision was published on 13 January 2017 and will come into force on 23  January 2017      

The amendments proposed to the Council’s advertised proposals serve to directly address concerns raised by correspondents in accordance with Outcome 2 of the Council’s Business Plan.

The proposed amendments will not be to the detriment of the main aim of the Council’s review of RPZA which is seeking to maximise the number of parking spaces available for use by residents within.

The proposed amendments will retain parking spaces to support the businesses and organisations operating in the zone in accordance with the Outcome 1 of the Council’s Business Plan.

To:

(i)       Implement the proposals as advertised.

(ii)      Amend the proposals in consideration of the comments received.

(iii)      Abandon the proposals.

Consultation has been undertaken with:

•         Councillor Atiqul Hoque, the then elected Wiltshire Council Member for the St. Edmund and Milford ward.

•         Salisbury City Council Members for the St. Edmund and Milford ward through the statutory TRO consultation process.

•         Members of the public through the statutory TRO consultation process.

•         Emergency services through the statutory TRO consultation process.