Grant Davis, Schools Strategic Financial
Support Manager, presented the report and updated the Schools Forum
on the issues relating to the Schools delegated budget for 2025-26
and the decisions that would need to be made as part of the budget
setting process. The following was then highlighted:
- Paragraphs 2 to 4 detailed the main
considerations for Members, with officers drawing particular
attention to Paragraph 3 which listed the notable changes to the
main funding formula for 2025-26.
- Paragraphs 5 to 9 were discussed and
referred to the National Funding Formula (NFF) where officers again
emphasised that based upon the School’s Block allocation, the
formula was fully affordable for the 2024-25 financial year,
applying all the NFF factor values.
- Paragraphs 10 to 15 referred to the
Growth Funding and Falling Rolls Allocations for 2025-26 and it was
noted that for a second year, the Department for Education (DfE)
had issued funding to Local Authorities (LAs) based on falling
rolls. However, it was reiterated that at the December 2024 meeting
of the Schools Forum, Members had decided to not introduce a
Falling Rolls Fund for 2024-25 based on a number of factors.
Furthermore, at the December 2024 meeting, Members confirmed the
criteria for allocating Growth Funding.
- Paragraphs 16 to 20 were then
briefly detailed referring to the historical position and
affordability considerations.
- The Minimum Funding Guarantee (MFG)
was then discussed as per Paragraphs 21 to 24, and it was noted
that at the December 2024 meeting, Members had agreed to set the
MFG at the 0.0% level, subject to affordability.
- Sparsity and Split Site Funding were
then briefly discussed as per Paragraphs 25 to 31 and officers
noted that Members had agreed to mirror the NFF sparsity changes
within the Wiltshire formula. Furthermore, it was highlighted that
the DfE had determined that funding for split sites would be based
upon a two-pronged criterion: Basic Eligibility and Distance
Funding. Paragraph 31 detailed the implications of such on those
applicable schools in Wiltshire.
- Paragraphs 32 to 35 referred to
Minimum per Pupil Funding Levels (MPPFL) and it was highlighted
that as the NFF was embedded, the quantum of funding awarded
through the MPPFL, and the number of schools eligible to receive
funding, should continue to decrease.
- Finally, Members were informed that
on Monday 20 January 2025, after the publication of the agenda, the
DfE requested that a new Disapplication Request be submitted in
respect of funding being allocated to schools which did not have
their own hall or playing field and were therefore required to rent
facilities to hold whole school events. It was explained that in
line with DfE Guidance, this would only apply to schools where the
rent exceeded 1% of their School Budget Share and that this applied
to 7 schools in Wiltshire. As such, officers had included a
supplementary recommendation for Members to ratify the decision and
approve the submission a new Disapplication Request to fund those
schools impacted as an exceptional circumstance.
There being no questions or comments, it was
then:
Following which, it was then:
Resolved:
The Schools
Forum:
a)
Noted the report.
b)
Confirmed its intention to apply all the funding factors at the
2025-26 National Funding Formula rates.
c)
Confirmed setting the Minimum Funding Guarantee at a level of
0.0%, as being fully affordable.
d)
Confirmed transferring 0.236% of the Schools Block to the High
Needs Block, £0.914m, as the full National Funding Formula
was affordable.
e)
Agreed the level of the Growth Fund at £0.5m.
f)
Agreed to fund the 7 schools for rent, with a total formula
value of £60,955, as an exceptional factor, in line with
previous years, and to submit a new Disapplication Request
accordingly.
(The decisions
numbered b – f above, were made later in the meeting under
Agenda Item 10)
Members took a
comfort break from 15.10pm – 15.20pm.