Liz Williams, Finance Lead – High Needs
Sustainability, alongside Ben Stevens, Inclusion, SEND & AP
Transformation Lead, updated the Schools Forum on the draft revised
SEND Sustainability Plan which was submitted to the Department for
Education (DfE) in December 2024. The following was then
highlighted:
- The background to the report and
confirmation of the DfE payments were detailed as per Paragraphs 2
to 10.
- It was then reiterated that a
revised version of the sustainability plan, subject to Cabinet
approval, had been drafted for submission to the DfE in response to
the fact that the Council was not on track to meet Agreement
Condition 2 to reduce the cumulative deficit. Furthermore, due to
the significant backlog and the increases in Education Health and
Care Plans (EHCPs) post-pandemic skewing the initial modelling,
significant revisions to the plan were necessary and as such, the
Council was now seeking agreement from the DfE to extend the plan
to a 7-year period as opposed to a 5-year period.
- Officers highlighted that Paragraphs
11 to 17 of the report alongside Appendix 1 provided further
details on the factors driving the overspend in the High Needs
Block (HNB).
- Despite this, officers drew
attention to the fact that the Council had made significant process
in clearing the EHCP backlog, therefore even though the backlog was
at its lowest level since 2020, more plans had been brought forward
as a result.
- It was confirmed that eight
short-term interventions had been developed and subsequently mapped
onto the revised forecast, but it was emphasised that all 8
interventions continued to place the needs of children and young
people at the centre and were grounded in an invest-to-save
approach.
During the discussion, points included:
- It explained that the reasons as to
why Wiltshire Council was in a different position to that of its
statistical neighbours were complex, and that officers were working
hard to analyse the data to fully understand the causations and
differences. It was further noted that some Local Authorities saw
an earlier increase in the number of EHCPs and could therefore put
mitigations in place to soften the impact post-pandemic.
- Members queried what the additional
risks were to extending the process by two years, to which officers
reassured Members that although the assumptions built into the plan
were ambitious, numerous actions were being undertaken to enable
officers to build capacity into the system. Furthermore, the High
Needs Sustainability Board also met regularly to deliver a further
layer of scrutiny and support.
- It was emphasised that one of the
reasons officers had taken the decision to extend the plan by two
years was to ensure that the experiences or outcomes for children
and young people with SEND, their families, and schools were not
compromised. As such, officers provided further assurance that any
and all children and young people who met the EHCP threshold,
regardless of the increased number of plans and backlog, would be
recognised and that through the plan children, young people, and
Mainstream Schools would be provided with the necessary support to
meet those children and young people’s needs.
- It was clarified that officers were
still awaiting feedback from the DfE on the revised plan.
- It was explained that officers
wanted to ensure that the support once needs had been identified
were as robust as possible, particularly throughout the system in
early years which would then inform further work on early
intervention, prevention, and support for families.
- The EHCP Top-Up Funding Consultation
was raised, and it was acknowledged that costs were rising in line
with EHCP requests, but it was emphasised that officers needed to
understand the data and the complexities around the top up review
in order to make long-term improvements.
At the conclusion of the discussion, it was
then:
Resolved:
The Forum noted the
update on the High Needs Sustainability Plan.