Erection of 4 houses, garages, parking and access following the demolition of the 3 existing buildings (Outline application relating to access and layout)
Minutes:
Public Participation
Chris Ward spoke in support of the application
The Planning Team Leader Adam Madge presented the outline application for the erection of 4 houses, garages, parking and access following the demolition of the 3 existing buildings (Outline application relating to access and layout). The application was recommended for refusal.
It was noted that Highways had raised concerns.
The Officer drew attention to late correspondence that had been circulated at the meeting.
There were two reasons for refusal, one related to the narrowness of the lane, and the other was due to the site being part of the Site Allocations Plan, therefore it was felt that this application was premature.
Members had the opportunity to ask technical questions of the Officer, where it was noted that the late correspondence detailed an error in the report, relating to the Parish Council, it was confirmed that the Parish Council objected to the application.
Members of the public then had the opportunity to present their views as stated above.
The Agent addressed some of the issues raised in relation to the adoption of the Site Allocation Plan, and stated that in time this site would be included in the settlement boundary.
He queried why this was the first he had known of the drainage concern, as it had not been made aware to them ahead of the meeting, he suggested a deferral to allow time for them to respond.
The Division Member Cllr Chris Devine then spoke, and apologised for calling this application in, adding that the application had no merit whatsoever.
Never on the neighbourhood plan. Witt Road was one of the most cramped roads in Winterslow, and was a single vehicle road. To put more vehicles on this road was the last thing we would need. This proposal was an inappropriate development. He supported the recommendation for refusal.
Cllr Devine then moved the motion of refusal in line with Officers recommendation. This was seconded by Cllr Britton.
A debate then followed, where they key issues raised included that the drainage report had not been provided until now, and Highways object as the road was inadequate to take any more use.
The Committee then voted on the motion of refusal.
Resolved:
That application 18/02580/OUT be refused for the following reasons:
Supporting documents: