If you are reading this page using a screenreader, we support ARIA landmarks for quick navigation too

Agenda item

Polling District and Polling Place Review

To receive an update on the forthcoming review of polling districts and polling places.


The Chairman introduced the item, and a presentation was received from Maggie Mulhall, Electoral Services, setting out the key elements and definitions of the Polling District and Place Review. The Chairman noted that the process would be technical and officer led.


Points raised included: the review was due by 31 January 2020, the review was only concerned with current boundaries as these were operational up to 2021, a Polling District was a geographic space within an electoral area, a Polling Place was a building that housed polling stations, a Polling Station was where voting took place, not all Polling Districts had Polling Stations, the purpose of the Polling District and Place Review was to make voting facilities reasonably practical and ensured they were Disability Discrimination Act compliant, and that the initial stage of the review was to run to May 2019 whilst the formal stage was to run to December 2019.


The Committee then discussed the forthcoming review, noting that one purpose of the Polling District and Place Review was to ensure compliance with Disability Discrimination legislation and a strong emphasis upon compliance was a distinguishing aspect of the next review.  Conducting Polling District and Place Reviews following elections to Council was described as best practice by the Returning Officer.


The debate moved on to address practical questions of how the process could be streamlined, what information would be gathered and what the nature of consultation would be in this context.


Officers clarified that the formal stage that was to run to December 2019 ought to be less onerous than the initial stage that was to run to May 2019 and that these two separate processes were both required by statute.  


The information sought from the consultation would be feedback from identified stakeholders.  Key stakeholders would have an interest in access and disability and would have local knowledge of accessibility and how it is perceived locally.   Stakeholders identified at this early stage were; Area Boards, disability groups and local political groupings.  


The consultation would use the Authority’s communications function and the consultation website, but would also be more loosely structured to capture local knowledge of individuals, potential venues, locations, access and transport.   Site visits could form part of the information gathering exercise.  The Committee was reminded that representations to the review would need to have a transparent audit trail. 


Local knowledge was agreed to be critical to ensuring an acceptable balance of accessibility with travel requirements. It was stated that anomalies such as voters being required to travel past one polling station to vote at another would be minimised.


The engagement of Area Boards was felt to be key and Area Board Chairs would be encouraged to make the Polling District and Place Review subject of a Chairman’s Announcement at their next meeting. A Councillor’s Briefing Note would be written and circulated to all elected members. Community Engagement Managers would be canvased on potential stakeholders to consult, and parish clerks would be provided with all relevant information.  


It was also strongly emphasised that the Polling District and Place Review had no connection or relationship to the ongoing Electoral Review.




The Committee approved being Officer-led in conducting the Polling District and Polling Place review.


The Committee noted the two stages of the polling district and polling place review; preliminary and formal reviews.


The Committee considered the approach to be taken for the preliminary and formal reviews.


The Committee determined the indicative timetable for the review.

Supporting documents:




This website